Even 'There Is No Point' Is an Interpretation
We can discover that we have added significance to an event and immediately create significance out of that discovery.
The first conclusion falls away.
Then a new one appears: nothing matters.
There is no point.
Meaning is all invented.
The source essay reaches this recursive moment through a private conversation whose repeated response is essentially: if you say so.
The private encounter need not be republished for the inquiry to remain useful.
The important move is noticing that negating meaning is still a form of meaning-making.
Saying an event proves everything is significant.
Saying the event proves nothing is significant.
Both are interpretations.
This does not require us to live without meaning.
Human beings interpret, value, care, and organize experience.
The practice is to notice the additional sentence.
What happened?
And what did I say it means?
Then, if I reject that meaning, what new meaning did I install in its place?
Even 'there is no point' is not the event itself.
It is something we say about the event.
