Criticism Is Part of the Test
A teaching becomes intellectually fragile when criticism has to be explained away. Praise is not proof. Criticism is not proof either. Both are information.
When we admire a teacher, institution, practice, or body of ideas, negative accounts can feel like threats to something that has mattered to us personally. The temptation is to diagnose the critic instead of examining the criticism. That move protects loyalty at the cost of inquiry.
The opposite move is equally weak: treating the existence of criticism as sufficient evidence that the entire teaching is worthless. Mature learning asks for more. What exactly is being claimed? What evidence supports it? Is the criticism about the idea, the method, the institution, or the conduct of particular people? What can be verified? What remains contested?
A useful teaching should survive serious examination without requiring critics to be saints or villains. Criticism is not an interruption of the inquiry. It is part of the test.