Read andreflect, consider, revisit, return

A distinction between instrumental action and action that does not need an added 'in order to' to justify itself.

Conversations

An Action Can Stand Without a Future Reward

We often explain an action by what it is supposed to produce. We do this in order to get that. The action becomes a means whose value depends on the result.

Many actions properly work that way. We study to learn. We repair something so it works. We plan because consequences matter.

But not every action needs to borrow its meaning from a later outcome. Some actions can stand because they are the actions we choose to take. We tell the truth because we are telling the truth. We make the work because we are making the work. We show up because we said we would show up.

A result may follow. The result can matter without becoming the source of the action.

That distinction changes our relationship to uncertainty. If the action is justified only by success, failure can retroactively make the whole effort seem meaningless. If the action also expresses a commitment, its value is not exhausted by the outcome.

Acting without an added 'in order to' is not indifference to consequences. It is refusing to make every chosen action wait for the future to justify it.

More in Conversations

All Conversations posts
Subscribe via RSS
Policy details

Shipping / fulfilment: No fulfilment applies to reading or sharing this article.

Returns: Nothing in the article itself is returnable.

Refunds & cancellations: Reading is free, so nothing is refundable.

Disclaimer: Articles are general information as published; verify time-sensitive facts and seek qualified advice where needed.