Read andreflect, consider, revisit, return

Excellence can be a shared possibility for how we participate, without becoming a claim that some people are worth more.

Conversations

Excellence Is Not a Ranking

We often use excellence as a verdict. A performance is measured, a winner is named, and everyone else is placed somewhere below. Measures are useful when a task calls for them. They become narrower when they begin to stand in for the worth of a person.

There is another way to approach excellence: as the quality of participation we can bring to what is in front of us. It may appear in careful craft, an honest correction, or the attention we give someone whose work will never be publicly judged.

This does not mean every result is equal. Skills differ, standards matter, and some work needs improvement. We can make those distinctions without building a hierarchy of human value from them.

Excellence becomes more generous when it is available as a possibility for everyone rather than reserved as a title for a few. We can ask more of our work while granting one another full standing.

More in Conversations

All Conversations posts
Subscribe via RSS
Policy details

Shipping / fulfilment: No fulfilment applies to reading or sharing this article.

Returns: Nothing in the article itself is returnable.

Refunds & cancellations: Reading is free, so nothing is refundable.

Disclaimer: Articles are general information as published; verify time-sensitive facts and seek qualified advice where needed.